Chayei Sarah 5770

“Let it be that the maiden to whom I shall say, ‘Please tip over your jug so I may drink,’ and who replies, ‘Drink, and I will even water your camels,’ her will You have designated for Your servant Yitzchak” (Bereishis 24:14).

Although it is clear that Rivka’s actions were to be interpreted as a sign from Hashem that she was the correct wife for Yitzchak, the Beis HaLevi shows from the verses that Rivka was genuinely being tested by Eliezer to display her kindness and astuteness. Firstly, she was tested to see if she would be gracious to a traveling stranger, letting him drink from the water that she had drawn for her own household. However, what was she to do after he drank? For all she knew the man who just drank directly from her jug of water had a dirty and diseased mouth! Even so, her attribute of kindness did not allow her to withhold the water from him. But still, says the Beis HaLevi, it would be very foolish of her to bring the potentially contaminated water home with her, behaviour clearly unbefitting a wife for Yitzchak. Yet, had she spilled out the rest of the water after he drank, it would have been a tremendous affront to Eliezer! Faced with this dilemma Rivka demonstrates her remarkable wisdom; “I will draw water even for your camels until they have finished drinking” (Verse 19). If there was a problem with the water it would not affect the camels, and by not spilling out the water she would avoid causing any embarrassment to the stranger. And lest her true intentions for allowing the camels to drink be caught on to, Rivka repeatedly draws fresh water for Eliezer’s camels until they were satiated, removing any trace of suspicion.
While Sefer Bereishis is not a book of mitzvos it is definitely a book of middos (character traits). It is unrealistic for us to expect ourselves to instantly be able to act with the kindness and calculated sensitivity of Rivka Imeinu, however, we are not exempt from our obligations to strive towards her lofty example.
Good Shabbos!

In the story of Eliezer’s Journey to Aram Naharaim to search for a bride for Yitzchak, his master Avraham’s son, there is an interesting feature in the narrative.  In the first part of the story, Eliezer is consistently referred to by the narrative voice as הָעֶבֶד – the servant, right up to the point where he runs to speak with Rivka at the well ” וַיָּרָץ הָעֶבֶד לִקְרָאתָהּ”  (Ber.24:17).  However, from that point onwards, he is referred to by the narrative voice as הָאִישׁ – the man (Ber. 24:21, 24:26, 24:29, 24:32), through most of the encounter with Rivka and her family.  However, after Eliezer gives his speech explaining his mission to her family, and Lavan and Bethuel agrees to give Yitzchak their daughter’s hand in marriage, the Torah reverts to calling Eliezer הָעֶבֶד.  

A simple pshat-level explanation is that the Torah is using the narrative voice to reflect how Eliezer is viewed by the characters around him at the various points in the story.  When Eliezer is with Avraham, and traveling with his men, Eliezer’s primary role is that of a servant.  However, how Eliezer is perceived changes dramatically once Rivka and her family encounters him.  Now, Eliezer is no mere servant.  He is the leader of an entire entourage of Avraham’s men, traveling in a convoy of camels, most likely impressively dressed, and presents Rivka with jewelry soon after they meet.  Indeed, Rivka herself tells Lavan about how she met “the man” (Ber. 24:30).  However, once Eliezer officially introduces himself, saying עֶבֶד אַבְרָהָם אָנֹכִי “I am Avraham’s servant”, and finishes explaining to Rivka’s family his mission on behalf of his master, the Torah reverts to having Eliezer be הָעֶבֶד – the servant.

R’ Bachya, however, has a novel reading of this change of Eliezer’s status.  He notes that back in the beginning of the story (Ber. 24:7), Avraham promises Eliezer that his mission will be successful and tells him הוּא יִשְׁלַח מַלְאָכוֹ לְפָנֶיךָ – “He (G-d) will send His angel before you”.  He further notes that the term הָאִישׁ is used at other times to refer an angel.  The Book of Daniel refers to the angel Gavriel as הָאִישׁ, and the man (הָאִישׁ) that guides Joseph to his brothers (Ber. 36) is understood to have been an angel.  Therefore, R’ Bachya writes,  “Once it is clear to him (Eliezer) that the angel is with him, his status is changed to a man (from a servant), and he is henceforth called אִישׁ, according to the name of the angel that is with him, who is called אִישׁ” (R’ Bachya, on Ber. 24:15).  Then, once Lavan and Bethuel say הִנֵּה רִבְקָה לְפָנֶיךָ קַח וָלֵךְ וּתְהִי אִשָּׁה לְבֶן אֲדֹנֶיךָ – “Behold Rebecca is before you, take [her] and go, and let her be a wife for your master’s son,” the mission is basically completed with success, Eliezer is back to being called “the servant”.  The angel is no longer involved, because Avrahams’ prayer that invoked angelic assistance has now been answered.

This commentary presents a beautiful idea about the interaction of angels with man. The usual image of angelic assistance is that of a winged being hovering around a person, helping him avoid danger and guiding him to success by pushing things this way and that.  The image that R’ Bachya presents is different.  Eliezer, at the crucial moments of his mission, is filled up with a divine emanation that changes his whole being, to the point that he is acting on behalf of the angel, and the angel is acting through him.

This week’s parsha has the interesting story of Avraham sending his servant Eliezer to find a wife for Yitzchak. At the beginning of the story, Avraham makes Eliezer swear that he will not take a wife for Yitzchak from the Canaanim, but rather that he will go find Yitzchak a wife from Avraham’s birth place in Aram Naharaim.

This is a very interesting request because we know that the Torah was unimpressed by Betuel and Lavan, Rivka’s father and brother, and described them unflatteringly. We say in the Haggadah:

צֵא וּלְמַד, מַה בִּקַּשׁ לָבָן הָאֲרַמִּי לַעֲשׂוֹת לְיַעֲקֹב אָבִינוּ–שֶׁפַּרְעֹה הָרָשָׁע, לֹא גָזַר אֵלָא עַל הַזְּכָרִים; וְלָבָן בִּקַּשׁ לַעְקֹר אֶת הַכֹּל

Come and learn, what did Lavan the Aramean try to do to Yaakov our father – That the evil Pharoah only decreed against the males, but Lavan tried to uproot it all.

This question is made even stronger by the fact that Avraham was living at the time near Aner, Eshkol, and Mamre, his three friends who had helped him win the war of the four kings versus the five kings.

The Abarbanel asks this question, and first answers it with a pragmatic answer. Hashem had promised Israel to Avraham and his descendants, not to the Canaanim. If Yitzchak married a Canaanite woman, the Jewish people would forever be tied to the cursed Canaanim (see the story of Noach) and the Canaanim would end up inheriting the land they otherwise were not due.

This answer however, does not deal with what was different about Avraham’s far-away, idol-worshiping family that made them worthy to marry their daughter/sister to Yitzchak. To answer this question, the Abarbanel cites an amazing answer given by the Ran.

The Ran writes that there are two types of mitzvot and aveirot. There are those that leave an impression on both the soul and the body — like those of actions or character traits, and those that leave an imprint only on the soul — like those of belief.

The sins that leave an impression on both the soul and body also leave a lasting impression on future generations. The Ran brings as examples the attributes of hatred, anger and jealousy.  Indeed, we often hear how abused children are more likely to become abusive parents themselves.

The sins of belief, however, are not passed on to the next generation in the same way. It is instead possible for children to reject the beliefs of their parents (as we saw happen with Avraham breaking the idols of his father Terach) and take on a new, more upright path in life.

The Ran says that the failings of the Canaanim were in the first category. They had bad character traits and while they may have been able at times to determine right from wrong, they more often let their emotions reign supreme.

Lavan and his family were evil in that they worshiped idols.  They did not, however, evidence weakness in controlling their emotions and actions.

The lesson here is that while it is obviously preferable to avoid all types of sins, working on and having a good character is of paramount importance and functions as th prerequisite to true spiritual growth.

The Ramban, in the opening to his famous letter to his son, echoes this idea beautifully.

שְׁמַע בְּנִי מוּסַר אָבִיךָ, וְאַל תִּטֹּשׁ תּוֹרַת אִמֶּךָ (משלי א ח)
תִּתְנַהֵג תָּמִיד לְדַבֵּר כָּל דְּבָרֶיךָ בְּנַחַת, לְכָל אָדָם וּבְכָל עֵת, וּבַזֶּה תִּנָּצֵל מִן הַכַּעַס, שֶׁהִיא מִדָּה רָעָה לְהַחְטִיא בְּנֵי אָדָם. וְכֵן אָמְרוּ רַבּוֹתֵינוּ ז”ל (נדרים כב ע”א): כָּל הַכּוֹעֵס – כָּל מִינֵי גֵיהִנּוֹם שׁוֹלְטִים בּוֹ, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (קהלת יא י): “וְהָסֵר כַּעַס מִלִּבֶּךָ, וְהַעֲבֵר רָעָה מִבְּשָׂרֶךָ”. וְאֵין “רָעָה” אֶלָּא גֵיהִנּוֹם, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (משלי טז ד): “וְגַם רָשָׁע לְיוֹם רָעָה”.
וְכַאֲשֶׁר תִּנָּצֵל מִן הַכַּעַס, תַּעֲלֶה עַל לִבְּךָ מִדַּת הָעֲנָוָה, שֶׁהִיא מִדָּה טוֹבָה מִכָּל מִדּוֹת טוֹבוֹת, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (משלי כב ד): “עֵקֶב עֲנָוָה, יִרְאַת ה’”.

Hear, my son, the instruction of your father and don’t forsake the teaching of your mother (Mishlei 1:8). Get into the habit of always speaking calmly to everyone. This will prevent you from anger, a serious character flaw which causes people to sin. As our Rabbis said (Nedarim 22a):Whoever flares up in anger is subject to the discipline of Gehinnom as it is says in (Koheles 12:10), “Cast out anger from your heart, and [by doing this] remove evil from your flesh.” “Evil” here means Gehinnom, as we read (Mishlei 16:4): “…and the wicked are destined for the day of evil.” Once you have distanced yourself from anger, the quality of humility will enter your heart.This radiant quality is the finest of all admirable traits (see Avodah Zarah 20b), (Mishlei 22:4), “Following humility comes the fear of Hashem.”

© 2010 myDvar.com Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha