Ariella Kopinsky

In this week’s parsha, the Torah discusses the laws of eved ivri – a Jew who is sold as an indentured servant to another Jew. If a man steals and cannot afford to pay restitution, he is sold into slavery for up to 6 years. Alternatively, a man can voluntarily, because of severe poverty, choose to sell himself as a slave. After 6 years, he is freed but can choose to stay with his master and continue to be a slave. If he chooses not to go free, he is taken to the Jewish court of law where his ear is pierced, after which he remains a slave until the yovel year, which occurs every 50 years.

Rashi[1] quotes the Gemara in Kiddushin, “let the ear that heard at Mt. Sinai ‘lo tignov – do not steal’, yet went and stole, be pierced. If he sold himself into slavery, let the ear that heard ‘ki li B’nei Yisrael Avadim – Israel shall be servants to Me (God)’ be pierced.”

If we pierce his ear as a punishment for stealing or for selling himself into slavery, why do we not pierce his ear immediately when he stole or sold himself? Why do we wait until 6 years later, when the slave decides that he does not want to go free?

The Kli Yakar[2] explains that Jewish law does not punish someone twice for the same offense. At the time of the theft, the punishment was to either pay restitution or to be sold into slavery. Now, six years later, the eved ivri shows that slavery was not a true punishment for him. In fact, he enjoyed it so much that he now wants to stay for up to 50 more years. His original offense then remains unpunished and piercing his ear serves as that punishment.

Rav Shimon Schwab[3] offers a different explanation. He argues that the sins deserving of piercing an ear (theft and selling oneself into slavery) were not actually committed until the point that the slave decides to renounce his freedom. When it says in the 10 commandments, “lo tignov­ – do not steal,” this refers specifically to “stealing souls,” i.e.  kidnapping. (The prohibition on monetary theft appears later.) The concept of “ki li B’nei Yisrael Avadim – Israel shall be servants to God” is also inherent to the first commandment heard at Sinai, “I am Hashem, your God, who took you out of Egypt, from the house of slavery.” Kidnapping is considered theft because the kidnapper, so to speak, steals the victim’s soul from its rightful owner, Hashem. He takes a person from the freedom to serve God, and imposes human subjugation upon him. So too, when a man voluntarily, not out of poverty or legal requirement, decides to remain a slave to another person, he is, in effect, kidnapping his own soul from God. He is choosing a human master over God and is therefore culpable for violating what his “ear heard at Sinai.”

Though we do not implement the legal structure of eved ivri today, we are still susceptible to rejecting Divine authority in deference to human masters. The eved ivri reminds us to keep our Divine obligations paramount to any responsibility to humans such as professors, bosses, or sfriends .


[1] Rabbi Shlomo Yitzchaki (1040-1105), a classic Torah commentator, who lived in France.

[2] Rabbi Shlomo Efraim of Luntchitz (1550-1619), a Torah commentator from Poland and Czechoslovakia.

[3] (1908-1995) Rabbi and communal leader in Germany and subsequently the United States.

When Paroah notices how numerous B’nai Yisrael became in Egypt, he enslaves them, saying to his people “הָבָה נִתְחַכְּמָה לוֹ,” “Let us deal wisely with him.” The Gemara (Sotah 11a) states that Paroah did not intend to outsmart the Children of Israel, but rather to outsmart “the Savior of Israel,” Hashem.

הבה נתחכמה לו להם מיבעי ליה א”ר חמא ברבי חנינא באו ונחכם למושיען של ישראל במה נדונם נדונם באש כתיב (ישעיהו סו) כי הנה ה’ באש יבא וכתיב כי באש ה’ נשפט וגו’ בחרב כתיב  [(ישעיהו סו) ובחרבו את כל בשר] אלא בואו ונדונם במים שכבר נשבע הקב”ה שאינו מביא מבול לעולם שנאמר (ישעיהו נד) כי מי נח זאת לי וגו’ והן אינן יודעין שעל כל העולם כולו אינו מביא אבל על אומה אחת הוא מביא אי נמי הוא אינו מביא אבל הן באין ונופלין בתוכו וכן הוא אומר (שמות יד) ומצרים נסים לקראתו.

Paroah knew that Hashem punishes מידה כנגד מידה, measure for measure. He didn’t want to kill Jews by fire or sword because he knew that Hashem could and would punish them by fire or sword. He tried to outsmart Hashem by choosing to kill the Jewish baby boys in water.  After the flood in Noach’s time, Hashem promised never to flood the world again. Paroah therefore reasoned that Hashem wouldn’t be able to punish him measure for measure for killing Jews in water. Paroah did not consider that God only promised not to flood the entire world and He could still flood one nation. Egypt was eventually punished by water at the Red Sea when the waters crashed down upon them.

Paroah was not an atheist. He believed in the “Savior of Israel,” and knew that He had the power to punish Egypt for their treatment of the Jews.  Nonetheless, Paroah thought that he could outsmart Hashem, tying down God’s hands, in a sense, so he couldn’t be punished. This was his downfall and led to the “power struggle” of the 10 plagues and the exodus from Egypt.

Paroah’s reasoning has been debated in philosophy and theology for thousands of years. If God is all-powerful, can He create a God more powerful than Himself? Whatever philosophical approach one takes, Paroah’s reasoning was definitely flawed as he not more powerful than God and was narrow minded when considering Hashem’s options of punishment. It says in Tehillim, הֲנֹטַע אֹזֶן, הֲלֹא יִשְׁמָע; אִם יֹצֵר עַיִן, הֲלֹא יַבִּיט. Surely the God that gave man ears can hear, the God that created eyes can surely see. The God that created the human brain is of course smarter than any human.

In a less obtuse manner, many people today use the same kind of reasoning to justify their actions. We often think that we can use our human reasoning to allow behaviors that Hashem said are wrong. “It’s OK if I cheat on this business transaction, because then I’ll have more money to give to tzedakah.” Some people make “deals” with Hashem such as, “after all You put me through, God, I deserve to not have to keep Kosher or Shabbos anymore.” Such a deal is not valid until one hears confirmation from God that He accepted the terms, which I don’t think is happening. “I have to say this juicy piece of Lashon Hara because otherwise my friends won’t like me. That’s important too, right?” We have all sorts of justifications like these, in which we use human reasoning to go against what Hashem has already communicated to us to be true.

Every year at the Pesach Seder, we should create for ourselves a personal redemption from our own Egypt mentalities. May we be able to break free of the bonds of these inappropriate justifications so that we can truly serve Hashem, on His terms.

Note: This Dvar Torah based on this week’s sicha by Rav Avigdor Nevenzahl, published by Yeshivat HaKotel.

© 2010 myDvar.com Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha